I’ve been an
advocate to getting the legislature back and weighing in on the Governor’s
decisions. But this weekend I found a good reason to keep them out of
Springfield.
House Bill
4704, assigned in March to committee, is most disturbing and illustrates a
clueless approach to lawmaking. Eighteen representatives have signed on the
“Right To Garden Act.” Who is against the right to garden?
That is a
highly deceptive name. The preamble is fine. But read 27 lines into the
proposed bill and you find this line: “The state or a unit of local government
may regulate gardens on residential property unless a statute or regulation has
the practical effect of precluding gardens on residential property entirely.”
Let me just
state for the record. I like vegetables. I might want to plant some tomatoes in
my back yard. How many of you think the city or the state should be allowed to
regulate personal gardens on personal property?
Well,
there are eighteen state lawmakers that think it’s a good idea. If passed in its
present form, that’s exactly what it would do.
The bill
also deals with the product of one’s garden saying it can only be consumed by
the owner. If I want to give a radish to my son, it's my business….not the government’s.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment