There are
some things that make sense. And then there’s nonsense. Tuesday’s Fairfield City
Council meeting provided more of the latter than the former….
The same
mayor who brought seven new liquor ordinances (which passed unanimously) last
month, cast the deciding vote thwarting the expansion of package liquor
licenses and Sunday alcohol sales. Last month he presented ordinances allowing alcohol
at banquets, non-for-profits and on sidewalks.
This week, Mayor
Brent Maguire told the council he was a youth minister and could not vote for
an expansion of package liquor licenses. No such statement last month. Frankly, I don’t understand the decision by
the mayor and Aldermen Jim Griffith, Ralph Barbre, Eugene McGill and Jerry
Lisenbee. This isn’t a wet/dry issue. Fairfield has been wet for decades…and
last month they made it much wetter. All they did this week was deny a
free and open market for consumers.
This is not
only a victory for the two current---and only---local package license
holders…..it also is being celebrated in Cisne and Flora where they sell plenty
of booze to people from Fairfield looking for a bargain.
Every one of
these aldermen voted to expand drinking by adding booze at hotels, festivals
and banquet halls---without reservation---only a meeting ago….
….but four
of them changed their idea of expansion by voting no on Tuesday to package
liquor licenses and Sunday sales. I’d
like for them to explain the difference.
This isn’t
an earth-shattering turn-of-events. It’s just curious.
…and for the
life of me, I can’t make sense of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment